← Back to MPs
Mr John MacDougall

Mr John MacDougall

LAB Labour Former MP
Last served Glenrothes (2001-06-07 – 2008-08-12)
0.0
Progressive
2 coded votes
363
Total votes
154
Ayes
209
Noes
0
Other

Parliamentary History

7 Jun 2001 – 12 Aug 2008 (7 yrs 2 mo)

Ideology spectrum

0.0
ProgressiveCentreConservative

Progressive — based on 2 coded votes across 1 axes (1% coverage).

Policy axis scores

0 = progressive, 50 = centre, 100 = conservative. Based on coded division votes.

Climate / energy 0
Low confidence 2 votes

Voting trends (most recent 12 months of activity)

Voting record

June 2008 3 votes
December 2007 3 votes
November 2007 4 votes
February 2007 2 votes
July 2006 13 votes
Division Date Vote
Our donation system is at least sometimes fairly open and transparent, but this is new territory for the United Kingdom, in the sense of working across a national boundary. It would be unreasonable to expect the Northern Ireland Office to operate solely as a single agency to set these precedents. I hope that silo thinking will not prevent a strategic approach from being taken. In essence, we simpl... 25 Jul 2006 AYE
My right hon. Friend the Member for Greenwich and Woolwich (Mr. Raynsford) welcomed the policy, as he has done consistently over months and years, and raised his concerns about the timing of the introduction of the mandatory elements in the packs. My hon. Friends and I will examine his words closely. The hon. Member for Cotswold (Mr. Clifton-Brown) made an important point about regulating estate a... 19 Jul 2006 NO
I am trying to be as helpful as I can be to the hon. Gentleman, because he has sought to improve the Bill, not to block it or wreck it, in great distinction from the behaviour of the Conservative party throughout its progress. I am following my right hon. Friend's argument. Will he confirm that, under our constitutional arrangements, the Assembly cannot require this House to pass legislation? The ... 18 Jul 2006 AYE
In the document before me, it says that "the Electoral Commission is an independent body established by the UK Parliament in 2000 by the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act. We are independent of the UK Government and political parties, and are directly accountable to Parliament." Will the hon. Gentleman answer this simple question: how on earth will it benefit the Labour party? That ... 18 Jul 2006 AYE
Question accordingly agreed to. Bill read the Third time, and passed, with amendments. Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 119 (9) (European Standing Committees) , 13 Jul 2006 AYE
Furthermore, the scheme must now require members to publish an annual report about cases dealt with under the scheme and lessons to be learned. We have taken it on board that there should be a guarantee that annual reports on lessons to be learned will be prepared and published. We have clarified that the free legal advice that may be provided under the scheme will be provided to the individual se... 13 Jul 2006 AYE
With this it will be convenient to discuss the following: Amendment No. 5, in page 5, line 1, leave out paragraph (a). Government amendments Nos. 13 and 14. Amendment No. 7, in page 5, line 10, leave out subsection (3). Government amendment No. 15. Clause 8(1)(b) enables the redress scheme to provide, in connection with proceedings under the scheme, for services other than legal advice. [Interrupt... 13 Jul 2006 NO
The Bill proposes an out-of-court settlement scheme at the outset, so that redress can be provided much more quickly to individual patients. The national health service will thereby be encouraged to take a positive approach to identifying mistakes and accepting and acknowledging problems by offering an apology and an explanation to such individuals, and by making financial recompense where necessa... 13 Jul 2006 NO
I should begin by reassuring the hon. Gentleman that the public value test will make a significant difference to the way in which the BBC operates in terms of future services, and despite the temptation on his part to suggest that the BBC would be moving into the business of antiques dealing or car dealing, I see absolutely no reason for it to move in that direction. The hon. Gentleman asked about... 10 Jul 2006 NO
adjournment (summer) 5 Jul 2006 AYE
"excessive tinkering with tax rules." We are not sorry to see the back of the sections 42 and 48 reliefs. We hope that the Government have at last got it right; otherwise, expect "Groundhog Day" this time next year with yet more changes to the film tax regime in the Finance Bill 2007. The continual cycle of change has produced a huge amount of uncertainty in the film industry and has jeopardised s... 5 Jul 2006 AYE
Amendment made: No. 27, page 98, line 43, at end insert— '(a) no account shall be taken of the fact that a property may fall to be described as owner-occupied by reason only of the provision by the company of services to an occupant who is in exclusive occupation of the property and is not connected with the company (within the meaning given by section 839 of ICTA),'. — [Ed Balls.] Amendment made:... 5 Jul 2006 NO
(4) For the purpose of sub-paragraph (2)(b), shares of one company are stapled to shares of another if in consequence of the nature of the rights attaching to the shares of the one company (including any terms or conditions attaching to the right to transfer the shares) it is necessary or advantageous for a person who has, disposes of or acquires shares of that company also to have, to dispose of ... 5 Jul 2006 NO
Page 1/13