← Back to MPs
Mrs Jacqui Lait

Mrs Jacqui Lait

CON Conservative Former MP
Last served Beckenham (1997-11-20 – 2010-05-06)
75.0
Conservative
8 coded votes
933
Total votes
506
Ayes
427
Noes
0
Other

Parliamentary History

20 Nov 1997 – 6 May 2010 (12 yrs 5 mo)

Ideology spectrum

75.0
ProgressiveCentreConservative

Conservative — based on 8 coded votes across 1 axes (1% coverage).

Policy axis scores

0 = progressive, 50 = centre, 100 = conservative. Based on coded division votes.

Climate / energy 75
Low confidence 8 votes

Voting trends (most recent 12 months of activity)

Voting record

April 2008 4 votes
March 2008 22 votes
Division Date Vote
(c) the membership of the organisation is open to organisations which are located in or persons whose principal place of residence, work or business is located in the specified community the organisation is established to serve (although the organisation may have different classes of membership), (d) over 50 per cent. of the governing body is elected by the members of the organisation, (e) the org... 31 Mar 2008 AYE
(6) The copy must be sent for registration during the period of 14 days beginning with the date of execution; but a copy registered after that period is valid. (7) Any body created by virtue of an amalgamation— (a) must be registered by the regulator and designated as a non-profit organisation, and (b) pending registration shall be treated as registered and designated as a non-profit organisation.... 31 Mar 2008 AYE
It is a pleasure to follow the hon. Member for Wimbledon (Stephen Hammond) , a fellow London MP. We enjoy excellent bus services in this great capital city, courtesy of TFL and on behalf of Mayor Livingstone and the citizens of London, in contrast to the various bus experiences that we have heard from hon. Members from different parts of the country. Will my hon. Friend give way? If my hon. Friend... 26 Mar 2008 AYE
Division 134 25 Mar 2008 NO
The right hon. and learned Gentleman gave his reasons for wanting an inquiry, and they were pretty clear. My hon. and learned Friend the Member for Medway (Mr. Marshall-Andrews) supported the case for an inquiry. He said that he does not want to learn lessons so that mistakes are not repeated. He said that he wanted to look at those responsible, and he wanted to ensure that they were brought to bo... 25 Mar 2008 AYE
Division 132 19 Mar 2008 NO
"why would the government want to use taxpayers money to give someone compensation for something that they are continuing to do". They do not lose all compensation. An adjustment is made— rose in his place and claimed to move, That the Question be now put. Question, That the Question be now put, put and agreed to. Question put, That the original words stand part of the Question:— 19 Mar 2008 AYE
A month of preparation, a month in gestation, a month of research, and that is all that the hon. Gentleman could come up with. The fact is that the great democracy of Germany and its centre-right Government are endorsing the treaty, the French Parliament has already ratified it, and the new Spanish Government are committed to it. I was enthralled by my hon. Friend's list of supporters of the Conse... 11 Mar 2008 NO
Question accordingly negatived. Motion made, and Question put, That the clause stand part of the Bill:— 5 Mar 2008 NO
Question accordingly negatived. It being more than six hours after the commencement of proceedings in Committee, The Chairman put forthwith the Questions necessary to dispose of the busine ss to be concluded at that hour, pursuant to Orders [ 28 January and 3 March ]. Amendment proposed : No. 296, page 4, leave out line 8 and insert— 5 Mar 2008 AYE
No one should leave the House saying that the European Scrutiny Committee did not consider the matter right to the end, including the question of a referendum. We took our job seriously, and I believe that those who have participated in the past 11 days of this debate have taken it seriously, too. The hon. Gentleman is recorded as having voted against a referendum nine times in the Committee. I un... 5 Mar 2008 AYE
Question accordingly negatived. The Second Deputy Chairman then put the remaining Question necessary to dispose of the business to be decid ed at that hour. Question put, That clauses 6 and 7 stand part of the Bill:— 4 Mar 2008 NO
Several hon. Members have spoken as parliamentarians rather than as party politicians in this debate. The hon. Member for Kingston and Surbiton (Mr. Davey) and I have not seen eye to eye throughout most of this debate— Throughout most of today. The hon. Member for Kingston and Surbiton and I have not seen eye to eye throughout most of today's proceedings, but on these amendments we see absolutely ... 4 Mar 2008 AYE
Question accordingly negatived. Amendment proposed: No. 47, in page 2, line 39, leave out 4 Mar 2008 AYE
Last week, we had— You're the president of the club. rose in his place and claimed to move, That the Question be now put. Question, That the Question be now put, put and agreed to. Question put accordingly, That the motion be made:— 4 Mar 2008 NO
Division 116 4 Mar 2008 NO
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill. I am delighted to rise in support of clause 4. It does not so much "secure for the workers by hand or by brain", but it does secure increased powers for the European Parliament. Although that may be one and the same thing. [ Laughter. ] Clause 4 fulfils the statutory requirement that any increases in the powers of the European Parliament m... 3 Mar 2008 NO
As I said earlier, what really astounds me in all this is the lack of transparency that taints this clause. I can do no better than to quote from the agreed conclusions of the European Scrutiny Committee—which is chaired by the hon. Gentleman—on the way in which the process had been tainted. It states in, I think, its most recent report, the third one of this Session, that "we reiterate our earlie... 3 Mar 2008 NO
My hon. Friend makes a very important point, as always. Do the Government have any plans to publish that, and if not, why not? I am delighted, and modestly surprised, to be responding to this debate so early in our proceedings, but glad that I have prepared a couple of hours in response. I am not sure whether the amendments tabled by the hon. Member for Stone (Mr. Cash) were intended to wreck the ... 3 Mar 2008 AYE
The hon. Gentleman makes an assertion in respect of section 2(2), rather than section 1(2) of the 1972 Act. If the hon. Gentleman will allow me to make a little progress and if time allows and the Committee's patience bears it, I will, of course, give way to him if he so wishes. This reflects the powers and definitions in the general provisions in section 1(2) of the 1972 Act, contrary to the hon.... 3 Mar 2008 AYE
I shall speak very briefly. We should be quite clear about what is happening here. This legislation is being guillotined, not programmed. It is being cut short in a most brutal and unhelpful manner. Presumably, that is happening because we are frightened of debating in this Chamber every massive change to the way in which we organise our affairs. The House of Commons has always been jealous of its... 3 Mar 2008 NO
Order. I reminded the hon. Gentleman during his own contribution that the debate on qualified majority voting is tomorrow. I know that the Minister has made some reference to it. I hope that he will make a brief comment at most, and then we can move on. Of course, as usual, I will abide by your strictures, Mrs. Heal, and we may, of course, have the opportunity to debate that in tomorrow's proceedi... 3 Mar 2008 AYE
February 2008 4 votes
Page 14/32