← Back to Divisions
commons
That sort of process is a scandal, to be frank. We would not tolerate it in other public bodies, and I do not understand why we are allowing it to happen with TfL. The whole purpose of having the lists proposed in new clause 1 is to make sure that the information is genuinely public. At the moment, even some of the people living on these sites are unaware of TfL’s ambitions. They were certainly no...
16 March 2015
#14490
192
Ayes
16
Noes
176
Majority
PASS
Result
Party breakdown
| Party | Aye | No | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON Conservative | 129 | 1 | 0 | 130 |
| LD Liberal Democrat | 21 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| UNK Unknown | 16 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
| LAB Labour | 3 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| IND Independent | 10 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| REF Reform UK | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| THE The Independent Group for Change | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| WOR Workers Party of Britain | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DUP Democratic Unionist Party | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |