← Back to Divisions
commons
That is an important point. My answer is that as I read through the provisions in the Bill, it was not clear to me that such a legally binding lock was in place. If there is any ambiguity in the process, there is nothing wrong in putting those belt-and-braces locks in place—in fact, it would be irresponsible of the House not to do so. Those provisions would include specific arrangements covering v...
23 January 2008
#12414
215
Ayes
290
Noes
75
Majority
FAIL
Result
Party breakdown
| Party | Aye | No | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAB Labour | 1 | 236 | 0 | 237 |
| CON Conservative | 112 | 1 | 0 | 113 |
| LD Liberal Democrat | 45 | 1 | 0 | 46 |
| UNK Unknown | 20 | 17 | 0 | 37 |
| IND Independent | 12 | 16 | 0 | 28 |
| THE The Independent Group for Change | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| DUP Democratic Unionist Party | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| PC Plaid Cymru | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| REF Reform UK | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CON Independent Conservative | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SPE Speaker | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |