← Back to Divisions
commons
That may well be right. That could be the solution. Under the test that I am proposing in amendment No. 19, if the people who were listening were unreasonable, that would give a perfectly good defence because the speaker would argue that they had no reason to foresee the consequences of their words. It would not be reasonable to expect someone to foresee the consequences where unreasonable people ...
9 November 2005
#11866
320
Ayes
278
Noes
42
Majority
PASS
Result
Party breakdown
| Party | Aye | No | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAB Labour | 260 | 11 | 0 | 271 |
| CON Conservative | 1 | 127 | 0 | 128 |
| LD Liberal Democrat | 2 | 49 | 0 | 51 |
| UNK Unknown | 19 | 21 | 0 | 40 |
| IND Independent | 16 | 21 | 0 | 37 |
| SCO Scottish National Party | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| DUP Democratic Unionist Party | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| PC Plaid Cymru | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| THE The Independent Group for Change | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| LAB Social Democratic & Labour Party | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| SPE Speaker | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| REF Reform UK | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| LAB Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| CON Independent Conservative | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| WOR Workers Party of Britain | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |