← Back to Divisions
commons
The Lords amendment we are debating requires the Bill’s provisions to be renewed if they are to be used in each future Parliament, but the Pannick amendment defeats the purpose of the Bill by permitting fixed-term Parliaments only if agreed by both Houses in a future Parliament. It effectively annuls the provisions of the Bill unless both Houses of every future Parliament vote to put the provision...
8 September 2011
#13549
255
Ayes
192
Noes
63
Majority
PASS
Result
How did your MP vote?
The House
One dot per recorded MP, coloured by party — ayes on the left, noes on the right. Hover a dot for the MP.
Party breakdown
| Party | Aye | No | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON Conservative | 170 | 10 | 0 | 180 |
| LAB Labour | 2 | 144 | 0 | 146 |
| UNK Unknown | 23 | 19 | 0 | 42 |
| LD Liberal Democrat | 36 | 2 | 0 | 38 |
| IND Independent | 11 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
| THE The Independent Group for Change | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| PC Plaid Cymru | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GRN Green Party | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| LAB Social Democratic & Labour Party | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| UK UK Independence Party | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ALL Alliance | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SCO Scottish National Party | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |